User:Rackzbrown/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Color wheel theory of love

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I found this article to be very interesting, informative, and relatable. It also had the potential of being a great article. The topic: Love, is universal, however, it is articulated by John Allan Lee in the form of a color wheel with different variations and meanings to those variations, which can add something new to a reader's understanding. My preliminary impression of the article was that it was informative and interesting but seemed to be based wholly on Lee's book with little contrast, argument, and agreement from other sources.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section clearly defined the topic of the article and was very concise, however, it did not provide a brief description of the major subheadings of the article, just made mention of them. The article's content was in direct alignment with the topic expounding and giving somewhat adequate explanations of the theories. There are areas that need revision to maintain the accuracy of information

The article is not of a persuasive nature but informative and geared to educate, therefore neutrality is maintained. It speaks to the key subtopics, with supporting scientific evaluations by other credible Psychologists. It is referenced, However, the content was heavily based on Lee's work, so it appeared more of a review than an article that drew from many reliable sources. A couple of sections were closely paraphrased and not referenced properly, which needed alteration to comply with the Wikipedia regulations although minimal. The sources and references are current. They are mainly centered around academic articles and journals written by Psychologists.

Overall the article is well organized and presented to the reader. The sections are clearly broken down to reflect the major talking points enhancing readability. That said, the article does present a series of grammatical errors. The article does not offer any images, however, it does provide working links to examples of movies that encompasses that particular love style as a theme.

The talk page discussions were very helpful as they honed in on specific issues such as the need for additional citations, and verification of citations. They also discussed the need for a psychological expert to distinguish between terms that were utilized.

The article is rated as a Stub-Class on the quality scale of low importance and is indeed a part of WikiProject Genetics.

Overall this article can be considered a good article with room for improvement. The article can be developed more by utilizing Its sources and references which cover a broad range of published Psychological journals and books to provide a wholesome discussion of the article. Other Improvements to this article can be made by rechecking references, links, citations, and grammar.

.