User:Racrz8/Bioactive glass/Crook47 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Racrz8 and PaladinSandalphon
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Racrz8/sandbox under Bioactive Glass Additions

Questions to Answer

~Crook47~
 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Specifically, additions to the History section as well as minor changes to the composition section make the article more readable and understandable by someone who isn't well-versed in ceramics sciences and therefore are welcome additions. The specific anecdote about the initial bioglass experiments in the History section are illuminating to the actual story of this material. The article is definitely more complete, but further development of the sections that the author's have set their sights on is imperative.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Most of the added content is describing practical uses of the materials which makes the material seem less foreign, as well as describing the development of the material which is an underdeveloped section in the current article. There is a specific focus on text based sources from what I can see, so maybe looking for more recent research like Source 6 to cite some other statements made in the article could prove useful.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Added content does seem to be very minute and detail-oriented as currently most edits are added words for clarification in a sentence. In the future, the author's could maybe look at further developing the History section with more information on the process of refining the material for use as they have already begun near the end of the additions that they already have.