User:Radavis12/Abyssocladia/Lillian self Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Radavis12


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Radavis12/Abyssocladia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hey! Your article is pretty good so far! I added some notes to it, but I am not sure if you can read them so I will state them here too. All of your citations used are good for your topic. I will say that just by scanning through them you are missing a good amount of information that could be put into your page. I understand that you are probably not done yet, because I know I am not, but it is just a thought. I downloaded my journal articles so I could read through them and highlight important notes that I wanted in my article.

I would suggest maybe adding a section about how the morphology amongst the species within the genus might differ as well as more morphology about the genus alone. I also think where they live is important to include along with their development if possible. Maybe even ecology? What they eat?

Oh and another note! It is important that you include the purpose of morphological features as well as what they are. Like what do they do? Why are they formed in different ways? Is it developmentally helpful? Those kinds of things.

Otherwise, great job! Your heading in a good direction.