User:RaeMer/Mysore Palace/Mteakert Peer Review

General info
RaeMer
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RaeMer/Mysore_Palace?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template (sandbox)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Mysore Palace:(current published article)

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

 * - Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

 * - The article is neutral. Nothing seems biased everything included seems to be there strictly to provide information to the reader.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

 * - I think that every topic in the article is touched on an appropriate amount. Enough information that I was able to understand and learn something, but not too much information that I got bored reading it.

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

 * - The links work when clicked on. The sources support the claims made in the article and are clearly cited within the text.

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

 * - The sources support the claims made in the article and are clearly cited within the text. Does not seem biased, just seems like straight out information.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

 * - It doesn't appear that any information is missing or out of date.