User:Rafahorle/Third Woman Press/Jae7419 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Rafahorle)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Rafahorle/Third Woman Press
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Third Woman Press
 * Third Woman Press

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I like the comprehensive background covered in the first paragraph. The information provided seems concise and has a neutral tone to it. The sections added really improves the article as it provides contextualization to the development of the Third Women Press. There was no images but there seems to be quotations from individuals, so that covers the two primary sources required for this article.