User:RagingWaterspout05/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)Deimos (deity)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article due to how there could be more information on Deimos than what was presented. This matters to me considering Greek Mythology is very intriguing. My preliminary impression of it is that, while short, has a good grasp on who Deimos is and his importance, but could use more information, if available, and giving further explanations as to what he does.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section: Does a good job in giving a detailed rundown on Deimos, such as giving insight into his heritage, family, and his basic premise.

Content: The content is very relevant to the topic, and each story with Deimos is balanced when giving the summary for what he did in each story. Although it does feel like there could be more information, sources on Deimos could be limited so there may still be new or unexplored details.

Tone and Balance: The article stays neutral, only referring to the facts about Deimos without adding any extra opinions or tidbits that do not relate to Deimos. There are no biased claims, and all viewpoints are accurately represented.

Sources and References: All the articles appear to be fact-checked, as well as pulling from original sources of work that have been verified heavily.

Organization and Writing Quality: The writing quality is crisp, consistent, and lacks any grammatical errors. The sections are broken down fairly well, although more information could be added to his roles in each work of Greek literature, but if there is none, it is no big deal.

Images and Media: The images included are minimal, but do add a lot to the topic of Deimos. They clearly demonstrate how he looked, as well as his job. More images could be included, such as more paintings from the Greek or Roman era.

Talk page Discussion: The talk page is fairly empty, but the reasonings and edits described look good.

Overall Impressions: This page does a good job at cataloguing a minor Greek God, but could use more information from other sources he was included in, as well as more images to better represent the image of Deimos. These images could be derived from his stories, or just general adaptations of Deimos.