User:Ragul sekaran/sandbox

what is big bang
Big Bang theory describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature. It is the prevailing cosmological model explaining the evolution of the observable universe from the earliest known periods through its subsequent large-scale form. The model offers a comprehensive explanation for a broad range of observed phenomena, including the abundance of light elements, the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, and large-scale structure.

Crucially, the theory is compatible with Hubble–Lemaître law—the observation that the farther away a galaxy is, the faster it is moving away from Earth. Extrapolating this cosmic expansion backwards in time using the known laws of physics, the theory describes an increasingly concentrated cosmos preceded by a singularity in which space and time lose meaning (typically named "the Big Bang singularity"). Detailed measurements of the expansion rate of the universe place the Big Bang singularity at around 13.8 billion years ago, which is thus considered the age of the universe.

Theory of big bang
How did the universe get started? How did it become the seemingly limitless place that we are familiar with today? And what will happen to it in the distant future? These are the conundrums that have baffled thinkers and academics for ages, inspiring some rather crazy and intriguing beliefs. The predominant view among scientists, astronomers, and cosmologists today is that the physical principles that govern our ever-expanding cosmos were also generated during the great explosion that gave rise to the universe as we know it.

What occurred prior to the ' Big Bang?
It's doable that before the large Bang, the universe was Associated with Nursing infinite stretch of an ultrahot, dense material, continuous during

a steady-state until, for a few reasons, the large Bang occurred. This extra-dense universe could are ruled by quantum mechanics, the physics of very little scale, Dodgson said. the large Bang, then, would have delineated the instant that classical physics took over because of the major driver of the universe's evolution. [What Is Quantum Mechanics?]

For Stephen Hawking, this moment was all that mattered: Before the large Bang, he said, events are unmeasurable, and therefore undefined. Hawking known as this the no-boundary proposal: Time Associate in nursing space, he same, are finite, however, they don’t have any boundaries or beginning or ending points, constant means that the world Earth is finite but has no edge.

"Since events before the large Bang doesn't have any empirical consequences, one could, in addition, cut them out of the speculation and say that point began at the large Bang," he said in an interview on the National Geographic show "StarTalk" in 2018.

Or maybe there was one thing else before the large Bang that' price pondering. One idea is that the large Bang isn't the start of time, but rather that it absolutely was an instant of symmetry. during this idea, before the large Bang, there was another universe, just like this one but with entropy increasing toward the past rather than toward the future.

Increasing entropy, or increasing disorder during a system, is actually the arrow of time, Dodgson said, therefore in this mirror universe, time would run opposite to time within the trendy universe and our universe would be in the past. Proponents of this theory conjointly counsel that alternative properties of the universe would be flip-flopped during this mirror universe. For example, scientist David Sloan wrote in the University of Oxford Science Blog, that asymmetries in molecules and ions (called chiralities) would be in opposite orientations to what they're in our universe.

A connected theory holds that the large Bang wasn't the start of everything, however, rather an instant in time once the universe switched from an amount of contraction to a period of expansion. This "Big Bounce" notion suggests that there might be infinite massive Bangs because the universe expands, contracts, and expands again. the matter with these ideas, Dodgson said, is that there' no clarification for why or however Associate in Nursing increasing universe would contract and come back to a low-entropy state.

Carroll and his colleague Jennifer Chen have their own pre-Big Bang vision. In 2004, the physicists prompt that maybe the universe as we all know it's the offspring of a parent universe from that a small amount of coordinate system has been ripped off. Carroll compared it to the radioactive nucleus decaying, which releases an alpha or beta particle. Since the figure universe produces child universes, possibly indefinitely, rather than just particles, it should function similarly. Carroll said, "It's simply a quantum fluctuation that shall

it happens. According to Carroll, these kid universes are "really parallel universes" that have no bearing on or interaction with one another. If that all sounds a bit surreal, that's because scientists haven't yet developed a way to peer back to even the moment the Big Bang occurred, much less what existed before it. Carroll noted that there is still room for investigation. The possibility that gravitational waves will be utilized to solve important riddles about the cosmos' evolution in that first crucial second has opened up with the observation of gravitational waves from effective galaxy collisions in 2015.

Carroll noted that theoretical physicists also have work to do, such as generating more specific predictions about how quantum forces like quantum gravity may function.

Carroll observed, "Until we have a theory, we do not even realize what we are looking for ."

conclution of big bang
The three phenomena are the galaxy contraction, the cosmic microwave background, and a comparison of the calculated primordial nuclear abundances with the current make-up of the universe. The vast majority of cosmologists currently agree that there was a big bang for these many causes. The agreement between the value of the current baryonic mass density revealed by abundance measurements and the value of that same quantity derived from anisotropies in the cosmic background radiation has further strengthened this acceptance.