User:Rahulmothiya/RfA Rationale

When reviewing RfA candidates, in addition to doing a careful review of the candidate's edits, I will consider whether the candidate meets the following criteria:


 * At least a year's worth of sustained, active editing experience.
 * A bare minimum of 6,000 edits. I expect to see a minimum of 15,000 edits from vandal fighters.
 * The majority of the candidate's edits have been made outside of the userspace.
 * The candidate should be extremely well versed in the policies and guidelines of the administrative areas he/she wishes to work.
 * A clean block log or no blocks for the last two years of sustained editing.
 * No open arbcom cases, no frequent reports of the candidate to WP:ANI, no recent controversial incidents, etc.
 * Use of descriptive edit summaries.
 * Work in the Wikipedia namespace; the candidate should understand the basis on which the project runs.
 * I tend to oppose candidates with more than 3 failed RfAs. Such is subject to a case-by-case analysis however.

If you satisfy the aforementioned criteria and if I have no additional comments, I'll !vote support with the comment, "Why Not?".