User:Rai6827/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Sanduk Ruit - Wikipedia

I wikilinked the article.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I've been reading biographies about famous personalities from all around the world since I was a child. Reading biographies and learning from their life experience has always been interesting to me. This article is about one of the most famous personalities of Nepal and his story is inspirational as well. It may need some work to improve it further, so I wanted to evaluate it.

Evaluate the article
Lead

The lead is quite long and gives us a lot of information about Ruit. It gives reader a very brief overview of the most important things of the article. The article is concise but I would consider it slightly over detailed.

Content

The content seems to be pretty much up to date. One thing that can be added to the content is about his early career and later rise in the career. One of the problem that I see is about the book named " The Barefoot Surgeon" by Ali Gripper in 2018 about Ruit which should have been added in the Media coverage section rather than in the lead. Overall, the article's contents are relevant to the topic but further more research should be done. More details about his struggle in life could have been in the early career section regarding the establishment of Tilganga Eye Center.

Tone and balance

I think the tone and balance is fine. The article is neutral is is not biased towards any particular position.

Sources and references

The sources are not formatted consistently which needs to get fixed. All the facts in the article are backed up by a reliable secondary source of information. All sources and references provided is relevant to the topic.

Organization and writing quality

The article is well written. It is concise and easy to read. It is packed up with information related to the topic. The information given needs to be formatted properly. It needs to get reorganized as it is broken down into sections that reflect the major parts of the topic. The article does not have any grammatical or spelling error.

Images and media

Only one picture of Ruit is provided in the info box. There are many other pictures available which can be used. Additional pictures can be added where necessary. But with the length of the essay, one picture is fine too.

Talk page discussion

In the talk page I got to know that some of the information provided in this article is copyrighted which problem is removed later. It lies under WikiProject Biography / Science and Academia. And the talks are more about edit done to the article. People are even talking about visiting his eye center.

Overall impressions

Overall, I think the biography is interesting. Ruit's story is inspirational. With furthermore research, this article can be expanded. Some of the information needs to be changed and kept up to date.