User:Rainy124/Polyuridylation/LuisNazaire Peer Review

General info
Rainy124
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Rainy124/Polyuridylation
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Polyuridylation

Evaluate the drafted changes
Rainy124's edits to the "Polyuridylation" stub are sufficient. Rainy124 not only added additional relevant information, but also improved upon the existing information in the article by adding a relevant source to the first sentence already included in the passage. The previous source prior to the edit, was not valid, therefore that sentence was plagiarized. Rainy124's addition of a source resolved this issue.

Rainy124's content that they added to the article is clear and easily comprehended. It contextualizes and elaborates on the initial lead sentence by explaining where polyuridylation occurs and why it is important. Without these additions, there would be a significant knowledge gap in understanding the relevance of polyuridylation to biochemistry. Rainy124's edits can be further elaborated on. For example "Cyltoplasmic poly(U) polymerases can be explained in terms of what they are or a link can be inserted here if available.

Rainy124's sources are secondary sources from reputable science journals. The sources lack significant, if any bias. The information added to the "Polyuridylation" article reflects the information in the sources. For the scope of the topic of polyuridylation, which is not something that was discovered recently, the sources are current (2007 and later).