User:Raj19Patel/sandbox

Style Reviewers believe Packing for Mars Roach brings intrepid curiosity, sauciness, and chutzpah in the book. She is great adventurous writer with inquisitive mind and perfectly timed comedy. Also she gets our imagination thinking like crazy about so many different things. What Janet Maslin, New York Times writer said it takes someone with superior dedication to do research about what is supposed to be in space and write about it. One of her favorite new words is human egesta. She cares about the linguistic acrobatics used by space scientists when they address things they don’t want to discuss because she thinks it important. A reviewer said Roach’s books have given science a spark to be interesting on reading furthermore. She likes to see things from varied experiments and endeavors. Also she does a lot of research for her books to be interesting and informative. New York Times Book Review, Kate Zernike, October 9, 2005 said Mary might have doubts about thoughts from her mind but, she writes with nothing but her passion from her heart. According to publishers weekly review Roach is an original with capability to talk about any subject. Why Mary is the finest writer is because is different she tries to see things differently where they are wide-ranging experiments from people attempting to tape the spirit voices of the Donner Party in the Sierra or to the Duke University doctor who wants to compute the energy equivalent of consciousness this makes her unique so we can learn different things review from San Francisco magazine. She does so much research into unexplored reaches of space travel for her book. Stiff offers good insight about life, death, and medical profession. The San Francisco Bay Guardian thinks it’s a joy to read. People Magazine said that her tone was really good because it was a conversation type format so it was great to follow along with and was remarkable on knowing how to bring objects she used to life while mentioning them. The Wisconsin State Journal thinks the book Stiff was so enthralling that once you start reading it you won’t feel like putting it down, you are going to want to finish it because you will be attached to it. Tribune Review, Pittsburgh thinks Stiff is actually very humorous and is intended to be a nice relaxed usual read. Reviewer of book Stiff Joe Queenan, author of Balsamic Dreams says she persuaded people that they didn’t know about fun that it doesn’t start until you’re dead by showing a different side of it in the book. What the Chicago Sun Times said was that it’s impossible for someone to move their eyes away from her descriptions in the book Stiff which is really important because you want the reader to feel connected to story and to have imagery of what’s going on and happening in the book. The Tampa Tribune said Roach goes where others wouldn’t go in there writing because they would be scared on knowing they passed the limit on going too far with a topic and she does all of this with great sense of humor and has it where it is a respectful study for readers. From the Library Journal the book Bonk a star review because it packed with information from physical, chemical, emotional about sex research with high quality concern and attention to detail showing she has great set of skills to put together a book like this and have humor with other things is rare. Deborah Blum, New Scientist says in the book you will find lessons on impotence, orgasm, unusual brave scientists and sexual behavior of species. Also Mary Roach is a writer that likes enjoying herself in more than one way. AJ Jacobs, author of The Year of Living Biblically said he would read the book Bonk just knowing the fact that is written by Mary Roach and knowing it’s about sex is another reason to read to it and he says the book is better than the act of sex itself. Greg Sapp, Library Journal thinks Bonk is the best science book of 2008 showing how good the book really is.