User:Raj1Patel/sandbox

You have done a sort of synthesis of some of the information present in a few of Roach's reviews, but you haven't clearly identified this information as critical reception (written by reviewers in response to the book), nor have you clearly helped the reader sort that information into an overall impression. You also don't really use a very wide range of sources, which will make your reader suspicious: why are you only referencing reviews Roach boasts on her website? Jmdeane1 (talk) 22:47, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

In Packing for Mars Roach brings intrepid curiosity, sauciness, and chutzpah in the book. She is great adventurous writer with inquisitive mind and perfectly timed comedy. Also she gets our imagination thinking like crazy about so many different. Roach’s books have given science spark to be interest in reading more. She likes to see things from varied experiments and endeavors. Also she does a lot of research for her books to be interesting and informative. Stiff offers good insight about life, death, and medical profession. It is a joy to read. Also her conversational tone and her gallow humor bring her objects to life. The books she writes are ones you don’t want to put down until you finish the whole thing.