User:Ral1092/Sykes' monkey/Muffinwrites Peer Review

General info
Ral1092
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Ral1092/Sykes' monkey
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Sykes' monkey

Lead
I like the new information that you've added to the lead, because it gives me a better idea of this species. However, since this information doesn't appear anywhere else in the article, it seems to be in conflict with the suggestion to not have any material in the lead that isn't explained in more depth in the body of the article.

Content
I would love to see you add more content to the body of the article that isn't written as part of the lead. Consider expanding on feeding habits, predator-prey relationships, behavior etc. in the body of your article. Your draft lead suggests that you have some interesting information about these areas, but it would be great to see this developed in the article body as well! (If your paragraph about feeding was meant to be in the body of the article, which I think may be what's going on here, I would recommend separating it from the lead with a section heading, updating the lead to indicate the presence of this new information, and still going more in-depth with the information itself, potentially from different sources.)

Tone and Balance
The content added seems neutral and well balanced, aside from making the lead of the article be weighted too heavily. Furthermore, if you are going to talk about feeding behavior, I might consider talking about habitats and other types of behavior as well, to give a broader and more balanced perspective.

Sources and References
Both of your sources look pretty reliable, but as one of them is a source that was already in the article, I think it would be awesome if you could search out a few more sources to add to the reliability and notability of your topic!

Organization
I think that the paragraph you have included with the lead in your draft may be best in the body of the article under its own section heading instead. I would also recommend doing another quick scan for grammar and sentence structure before you move your draft to the main Wikipedia page!

Images and Media
No images and media have yet been added. Considering the current length of the article, I think this lack of images makes sense, as adding more would make it too image-heavy. (If you expand your article it would be great to see you add more images as well, though!)

Overall Impressions
I think that your article has a lot of potential, but I would love to see you go more in-depth with it. As it stands right now, it looks like all of your new information is connected to your lead as opposed to adding individual sections to your article. Furthermore, I think that it would be great if you could contribute more new sources and information to your article, as what is there right now is currently very limited.