User:RamFan76!/Criminal justice reform/Goosethemoose123 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(RamFan76!)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Criminal justice reform
 * Criminal justice reform

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The section of the article that was edited, was very well done. I feel as if I have learned a great deal of information in just the little bit that I read. It almost feels like it is some random knowledge that I will have in my head at all times. The section is very very clear to read and the formatting is very well organized. When reading the section, I did not find any grammatical errors that stuck out to me. Overall, I think that it was the edits were very well wrote and very clearly stated.