User:Rambhu/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Inspired by Indigenous Feminism but would like to do my article on Red Dress Day specifically.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
After reading the class material thus far, i noticed this page really lacked further elaboration on the Canadian context of Indigenous feminism, especially MMIWG and important dates like Red Dress Dat

Lead Section:
Good lead section but fails to address matriarchal relations until the critiques. Very concise, and explains Indigenous feminism at length and connects to other links like decolonization. But could also add a link where it says ("MMIW)" and correction to (MMIWG).

Content:
All content is relevant, but like previously mentioned this fails to address the Canadian context further and should add more according to the "Variations According to Nations" would be nice to get specific to nations.

Tone and Balance:
Article is pretty neutral throughout, pretty up to date but at times uses the word "Aboriginal women" to describe Indigenous women in Canada. Needs to be updated to stay consistent.

Sources and References:
Sources are up to date, dating to 2021 too. Good sources include Kim Anderson and Cheryl Suzack, I am familiar with the work of these scholars and they are very reputable.

Images and Media:
Fails to use images, uses the general feminist logo and misrepresents Indigenous feminism and uses this logo as an "umbrella". Needs more images to illustrate.

Talk page discussion:
Not very many discussions on the Talk page, this article rated a B class. This article has yet to receive a rating on the importance scale, I feel this article is vital in understanding Indigenous feminism and Indigenous nationhood and needs to be rated and should be rated high.

Overall:
This article has alot of detail and is very lengthly but requires more specifics as mentioned above and corrections so the article is consistent throughout in terms of language used and up to date with language.