User:Ramen.01/Asexuality/JoelyB Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Ramen.01)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Ramen.01/TheAceCommunitySurvey

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation

 * The Lead begins with a sentence that can concisely explain the Ace Community Survey.
 * It demonstrates a brief preview of the history of the survey, as well as its affiliations throughout its years of existence.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation

 * Content is relevant, as it details the development of the Ace Community Survey, and its results from 2014-2018
 * Content is up to date

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation

 * Content is neutral and does not seem biased; it explains the history and results of the survey objectively
 * All content is presented equally; less information for 2017 and 2018 surveys because they have not been published yet, but good job explaining the specifics of what was asked in the survey!

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation

 * Lots of content is backed up by the official holder of all Ace survey analyses, which is great!
 * There are some references that bring me to another Wiki page, which may not be the most reliable - if possible, try to find scholarly articles or reliable newspaper articles that can get you the same information you found on the Wiki (or look at the Wiki pages and see what sources are listed as references).
 * Sources are current and all links that I tried work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation

 * Some minor grammatical errors to be checked over - pay close attention to the verb tenses you are using; make sure the ones in the same sentences are consistent to one another! (e.g. "identified" and "falls" in the section about 2014 surveys and reports)
 * Content is appropriately organized
 * Content is concise and easy to read

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation

 * The image enhances my understanding of the topic, and the caption is very informative
 * The image is put in an appropriate place in the article
 * The images follows copyright regulations

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

New Article Evaluation
N/A

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation

 * Safat, you have done a great job with your contributions! You give detailed accounts of the history and past results of the Ace Community Survey. Watch out for small grammatical errors - be sure to proofread your draft one more time and then you should be good to go!