User:Ramirez4422/User:Tania-ctz/Berlinde De Bruyckere/Ramirez4422 Peer Review

General info:

Who's work are you reviewing?

Tania-ctz

Link to draft:

User:Tania-ctz/Berlinde De Bruyckere

Overall Peer Review:

Tania-ctz has a very constructive article. With proving main details and providing sources throughout that are relevant to the subject, To be nit-picky, It would be best to cite certain topics the average reader wouldn't understand in order to make it stronger than what it is.

I would recommend more images to make it more appealing for the visual learner.

Everything else is relevant to the topic assigned

This article has a strong structure that makes it easy to navigate.

The tone is neutral and balanced.

I don't see any biased take on the article assigned.

Sources are accurate and consistent throughout the page.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)