User:Ramirezd2/Capacocha/Beck Woollen Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Dear Ramirezd2,

I really like what you've added to the article so far. The Quehuar site is about perfect length, compared with other parts of the article. Just since the trainings made a note of not overemphasizing any part of the article, just wanted to point out that it's in really good shape on this front. With that said, the details provided are really useful. Something I am curious about is whether there are any additional details that can be added in; I see in a few sentences, there are four sources sited. This makes the claims really credible, but it left me wondering whether these different authors say anything unique/offer their own spin on the claims being made? I felt that your contributions were very neutral, which was great. At first glance, the sources that you chose all seem pretty credible. My only other suggestion is that, if you are able, it would be awesome to add a photo of the human remains at Quehaur. Since there is a photo immediately above for the Llullaillaco site (extremely well-preserved), it could offer a valuable contrast to show how poorly-preserved these remains are due to tampering and dynamite. Overall, I think this is in really good shape!