User:Random2187/Agamemnon/LieutenantKennedy17 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Random2187


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Random2187/Agamemnon?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Agamemnon

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: No changes to the lead, but it was effective at providing a clear and short explanation of Agamemnon.

Clarity of Article Structure: The updates to the article structure were good, and I thought the way you reorganized the Trojan War section was a significant improvement. The additional section about The Curse of the House of Atreus was beneficial and helped provided more information about Agamemnon. Overall, the structure is in a sensible order that would be helpful for a reader.

Coverage Balance: This updated article provides a better description of Agamemnon that incorporates multiple sources. The information added to it was helpful as well and provided a more complete picture of the story of Agamemnon. Because there is no existing article for The Curse of the House of Atreus, the information you included was necessary and helpful, but at times it seems as if there was a bit too much information not about Agamemnon. Would it be possible to summarize the paragraphs about Pelops and Hippodamia so that it focuses on Agamemnon more? The additional pictures added were good as well and necessary for the content.

Content Neutrality: The article has a neutral perspective that does not try to promote one view over another.

Sources: All sources included were reliable and supported the information on the page. The Iliad section of the Trojan War has a notification that it needs a citation, and I agree that more citations in this section would be beneficial.

Overall, I think all the updates to the article were great and helped better explain the story of Agamemnon.