User:Randomeditor22/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
I am evaluating the "Communication Theory" Wikipedia page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_theory

Why have you chosen this article to evaluate?
For this assignment I chose "Communication Theory". Out of the options, I picked this one most importantly because I am a communication major. I have taken a class where we talked about different theories that go with communication, and we touched on this one slightly. I was interested in it and now can look into it further.

Evaluate the article
Lead section: The lead section is concise and does a good job of giving a brief description. Content: The content is relevant and pretty up to date due to the fact that this theory is not something that is evolving but new and improved information seems to have been added. I would say that there are some areas that could possibly have more information. Tone and Balance: The tone of this page is neutral. I think it is filled with so many facts and details that it does not stray to an opinion. Source's: The page definitely has a lot and the ones I clicked on all worked except some needed an account to gain access. Organization: The writing is overall clear and concise, but I do think the organization could be a little better. Images and Media: This article has one image right by the title but none within the article itself. Talk page discussion: A lot of discussion on the talk page is going back to 2005. I think the article has improved more since the corrections they were talking through which I can see their point for some of them. Overall: I think this article has some good starting points and just needs tweaks to make it a stronger article. It is underdeveloped in a lot of the areas.