User:Randy Kryn/sandbox

source

For full italic title override see code

For lower case: DISPLAYTITLE:name|noerror

italic_title = no 9988 Moon dust, first Moon landing Core topics, WP:CLOSECHALLENGE, a well-written close https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Categories,_lists,_and_navigation_templates/Archivel_9#RFC:_Should_Sister_Project_links_be_included_in_Navboxes.3F Pre-Columbian North America
 * ngrams
 * userspace draft list
 * Database reports/Linked miscapitalizations
 * Gordo at simple
 * Draft:Abraham Lincoln (Bittinger)
 * food days
 * |line|1-year|editor_type~anonymous*user|daily activeeditor stats
 * WP:RESCUE
 * delete Earth
 * EEng's museums
 * Interesting articles chronicled on a user subpage
 * Wikimedia stats
 * Sanger about bias
 * |Dog page views
 * Editor Interaction Analyzer
 * User page of long but probably interesting essays
 * admin reading list
 * A well-done scene
 * dnarnamolecules
 * Talk:Queen's Gambit
 * Thomas Ricks book, October 2022
 * Report of a coder working at WMF
 * W in transit
 * , artworks
 * called the Wikipedia bible
 * User group rights
 * Weller link
 * whome?
 * Gumby Moon Trip 1956
 * group2 = Archaeological sites
 * list2 = S.E.C.C. hero twins 3 HRoe 2007-transparent.png

In 2009 scientists announced the discovery of a carving of a mammoth or mastodon on a piece of bone found north of Vero Beach (the general area in which Vero Man was found). The carving may be the oldest art found in the Americas. Scientists studying the carving noted similarities with Pleistocene art in Europe. Forest ring (?) Hanna Pauli, Frukostdags guidelines ytube tiebreaker Navigation template directive Jack Sacco on shroud
 * Manquoa

(from Edwardx's page:
 * User:Antandrus/observations on Wikipedia behavior Plenty of good advice
 * User:Raul654/Raul's laws More pearls of wisdom

earthmoonng

uppercasinglunarmodule Little Arpad (chicken identification)


 * Keep, incorrect reasoning, per above comments. Deleting because of the "better as a category-list-template" argument (or any combination thereof) does not only not fit the guideline, but turns the guideline on its head. These arguments have always been and are always invalid. The guideline says that the three ways to create maps on Wikipedia - lists, categories, and templates - complement each other. They are separate. And are encouraged to be separate. Deleting any of these three ways to map Wikipedia because there is an existing category, or list, or template, violates the guideline. They are, by existing language, useful partners. 20 September 2019
 * Wikipedia recognized and encourages Lists, templates, and categories as three separate and equal ways of ordering a topic, and they exist in tandem. Categories, lists, and navigation templates clearly defines this upfront: "This page in a nutshell: Categories, lists, and navigation templates are three different ways to group and organize articles. Although they each have their own advantages and disadvantages, each method complements the others."

Wiki tools (brought from user:AlanScottWalker's page)
 * Search through a page's history for edits made by a particular user
 * List changes made recently to pages linked from a specified page
 * List contributors to an article, ranked in order of activity
 * Find images for a given article, using interwiki links
 * Find which Wiki pages link to a particular site
 * What pages have you and another edited?
 * User's across-projects contributions
 * Search Wikipedia's back pages
 * Who wrote that? (Wiki blame)
 * Request page protection
 * Fix bare url reflinks
 * Readability meter
 * X!'s edit count
 * Wikichecker
 * 3RR tool
 * Review
 * Emote
 * Help
 * ap research
 * pixeluniv

(from a user page. probably a lot more than 25%: A sutdy sowehd taht olny 25% of poelpe can raed tihs. All you hvae to do is tkae the frsit and lsat lteter of a wrod and the raest can be ttolaly mxeid up in the wrod. The sduty siad taht the hmaun biran dnesot raed the wolhe wrod, but olny prat of it. If you are one of the 25% taht can raed tihs, put tihs in yuor usperpgae. )
 * User:Crunchydillpickle/cool some good stuff
 * Toby
 * File:WikiConference North America 2018 - Friday Group Photo.jpg
 * File:WikiConference North America 2019 Group Photo VHG 8222.jpg
 * File:Wikimania 2017 Closing Ceremony Group Photo-1.jpg
 * 2023 conference Signpost report

Journal of the American Revolution, 2015 ( multiple major historians, including John E. Ferling and Daniel Tortora, each interview is an individual source), 2017 (Werther). See sources below.

Richard Werther’s "Analyzing the Founders: A Closer Look at the Signers of Four Founding Documents" article in the Journal of the American Revolution, and another Journal of the American Revolution signed paper by Werther, "Roger Sherman: The Only Man Who Signed All Four Founding Documents", where again the Journal names the signers (in Sherman's case, signer) of the Articles of Confederation as one of the four founding documents

Founder of the Day article "Signers of the Continental Association"



This is another example of a theory I've bounced around that Wikipedians, when given limited number of things left to do as the years go by and being accustomed to doing many edits a day/week, will turn to deleting normal components of existing pages. Please be aware of this tendency and take it into account, thanks.