User:Raniya 03/Rumination (psychology)/Care.03 Peer Review

General info
Raniya 03
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Raniya 03/Rumination (psychology)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Rumination (psychology)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Raniya, I really like your chosen topic. For you lead, I think there is a bit of a repetitive touch in the first two sentences. Combining those would make is easier to read with a certain cohesiveness. Also in your lead/introduction the topic description is harder to follow. Breaking it down into easier sentences and even sentence structure would be a better read and more enticing for researchers.
 * I like the last paragraph on MBCT, however the proceeding one is a bit complicated to follow. Again, I think breaking it down into clearer sections and sentence structure would provide clarity.
 * Overall, your addition is neutral and and has academic, evidentiary support that is mostly up to date. Consider adding more articles within the past three years.
 * Overall, your addition is neutral and and has academic, evidentiary support that is mostly up to date. Consider adding more articles within the past three years.
 * Overall, your addition is neutral and and has academic, evidentiary support that is mostly up to date. Consider adding more articles within the past three years.