User:Rans Flanders/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Brian Blount

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It's a small, short article, without much information to it. I figured if I should start anywhere, I should start small. It took me less than two minutes to read, and it's about Brian Blount, an American Biblical scholar.

Evaluate the article
Information is straightforward and brief, but it is fairly detailed for two paragraphs. The article consists of a description of who Brian Blount is, his accomplishments, and his theological history. It lists every work he's contributed to, and the article itself possesses two sources, with no areas where citation is needed. The article is fairly up-to-date but information could be missing, as the last edit was nearly a year ago. That's plenty of time for Blount to have a new article or study under his belt. The article doesn't seem to try to predispose you to any particular opinion of Blount, and it is honest and fair. However, it is very short, which may be concerning, depending on how much of him is known. As he seems to be a fairly obscure figure, I do not believe the brevity of the article is of any concern, but if there is more to Blount's life and academic presence, then it is necessary to communicate that through the article. The only presence on the talk page is the InternetArchiveBot, so there's not much discussion about this fellow going on.

Since this is indeed an article about a man, perhaps there is a chance we could include some non-invasive information about his personal life?

~Rans Flanders