User:Raomes/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

The Primitive Hut

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it was related to architecture, which is my major. This article goes back to the original ideas and principles of architecture and where it all came from as a whole. The Primitive Hut is an architectural theory that was brought up by abbé Marc-Antoine Laugier. This article provides a good look into the early ideas of architecture and how it used to viewed, which is what caught my interest in choosing it.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)The lead section for this article is very well written. It provides the history of the Primitive Hut, which includes who theorized it, which century, and exactly where it was applied in theory. It was also able to give details as to when it was written, the Age of Enlightenment, which gives a bit of an insight on how it was developed. This article also gives relevant content, like the different types of primitive huts, origins, premise, and how it can be applied to architectural theory. This article is also very organized, concise, and has no spelling or grammatical errors. This article provides only one illustration which provides a clear illustration on the topics that are explained throughout the article. My overall impression of this article is that it is very well organized and nicely written. It is able to provide good content that gives a good understanding on the history and how the Primitive Hut can be used in architectural theory.