User:Raphifounette/Geodia megastrella/Gabrielcalistro Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Anki268822 and Raphifounette


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Geodia megastrella
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Geodia megastrella

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is concise and does provide points that are later discussed in detail in the sections of the page.

The content is relevant and specifically address the species being discussed in morphology. There could be more information on the relatives of the geodia megastrella and its greater taxonomic classification. Instead of countries the species is found in a world map highlighting the region they are from is better. Countries change, maps typically don't.

Another Image or two would be excellent. Overall good content, but could use a bit of tweaking. There is a bit of empty space by Taxonomy that could be filled.

By reading this I got a understanding of the morphology the most, but should see more about the species' eating, life cycle, anatomy, and such. Almost completed!