User:RareTM1/Amaru (mythology)/Slovakia's finest Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

RareTM1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:RareTM1/Amaru (mythology)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Amaru (mythology)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The article's lead is in excellent shape, and my peer updated it according to the requirements. The lead includes a concise and clear introductory sentence that gives the reader a straightforward description of the article's topic. Since the article doesn't have a section to this day, it doesn't include a brief description of its major sections. It doesn't include any information that would not be present in the article and is not overly detailed.

Content

The content is relevant to the topic and enhances the reader's understanding of the topic. It is up-to-date as the sources used for the new information are current. The article is very short so far, and some content is missing right now; however, there is no content that doesn't belong to this article. The article doesn't deal with Wikipedia's equity gaps or address topics related to historically underrepresented populations.

Tone and Balance

The content added to the article is written in a neutral tone, with no claims that would appear heavily biased toward any particular position. Moreover, there are no viewpoints over or underrepresented, and the content doesn't attempt to persuade the reader to favor any positions.

Sources and References

The content is backed up by two reliable secondary sources of information; however, the content itself is missing in-text citations as it doesn't cite any references in the text. The picked sources are thorough and current, reflecting the available literature on the topic. It's impossible to tell if the sources were written by a diverse spectrum of authors as little information about them can be found. However, they seem like experts in their respective fields, which is the most critical part. The sources picked are of good quality, but the author of the article might try to look at and use some of these sources that I found while doing my research.


 * 1) Inca Myths" by Gary Urton - this book is a collection of translated Incan myths
 * 2) "The Handbook of Inca Mythology" by Paul Richard Steele and Catherine J. Allen - this book provides an in-depth exploration of Incan mythology.

The sources and added references didn't include any links to try.

Organization

The content added is well-written, concise, clear, and easy to read without grammatical errors. However, it is very short, with little new information provided. It's only possible to tell if the content is well-organized as there needs to be more information in order to break the article down into sections.

Images and Media

My peer didn't include any images or media yet.

Overall Impressions

The content added improved the quality of the article by a little; however, there was not enough content added to have an actual influence on the article's quality. The added texts definitely enhanced the quality of the information provided as it is well-written, well-researched, and adds new information to the article. The main improvement needed is the amount of content that has been added.