User:Rarinakamirez/Blackfoot religion/ZacharyAHanson Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Rarinakamirez


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Rarinakamirez/Blackfoot religion


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content:

The content is relevant, presenting an effective summary of the cosmology. It is up to date, containing citations from several time periods. Although the "Other deities and spirits" section feels incomplete, the majority of the article feels fully formed, and there is no unnecessary information presented. Although equity is not mentioned, it is not relevant to an explanation of the cosmology of this religion.

Tone and Balance:

The content is neutral, simply explaining the cosmology of this religion without innuendo. No claims appear to be biased, with a straightforward summary being presented. The views presented are accurate, and do not suggest a position for a reader to take.

Sources and References:

All claims are backed up by secondary sources, and these sources are accurately summarized within the article. The sources are thorough, representing several perspectives, and they are, for the most part, current, with the older sources being earlier secondary ones. The sources are diverse, representing a wide set of views and several from members of the marginalized group itself. The sources presented are the most credible ones which were widespreadly available, consisting of several well-kwon and foundation sources. All the links on the page are still alive and work.