User:Rarinakamirez/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I wanted to pick one that was C-class in the religions section. I am also hoping to possibly change my article to this one as well, as I was always intending to focus on a Native religion.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is pretty good, the first sentence definitely entails the summary of the Olmec religion and it also gives some good background to the findings of this information, including a precursor to the difficulties of researching practically dead religions. It is also nice and concise. The content is relevant, however I would not know if it is up to date, as I am obviously not an expert in the field. It could definitely use more content, however I understand the lack of information affects this a lot. The article is definitely neutral and has no conflict of voice or bias. The article is well sourced, with practically every sentence ending with a citation. The links all seem to work and the sources are relevant and trustworthy.

The talk page of this article is pretty dry, there are no new responses as of 2017 and most of the conversation dates from 2009. The article for sure needs more content, however the content that is present is of good quality and has been well researched.