User:Rashaaasfour/Colorado tick fever/MatthewBroadway Peer Review

General info
(Matthew Broadway)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * First, what does the article do well? The article is straight to the point and talks about the virus and the Tick I like how you were able to keep everting compact and not too overwhelming. Is there anything from your review that impressed you? I think visually it was very pleasing and was a clean look. Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? "Colorado tick fever (CTF) is transmitted through the bite of an infected Rocky Mountain wood tick."
 * What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? I don't know if I'm the person to ask for this but I would try to go into depth about what happens if you don't get treated what happens over time. Why would those changes be an improvement? It will show the affects if not treated and show all the outcomes of the tick
 * What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Not much but to maybe add more detail and try to get more fax's about the tick and the fever.
 * Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? I will try to get my article to look as clean as yours.

Respond to review
Hey MatthewBroadway,

Thank you for leaving me thoughtful feedback. I appreciate your nice comments about everything being compact and looking clean. I put a lot of effort into the formatting and adding that image to help with the look. That's a good point on possibly expanding the talk around treatment. I'll try to find some additional info if it's available.

Thanks, Yogilover3