User:Rashaaasfour/Gruinard Island/BrightBuds Peer Review

General info
Rashaaasfour
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Rashaaasfour/Gruinard Island
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Gruinard Island

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think that all of the info added to the page is sufficiently on-topic and informative. I especially appreciate the added paragraphs on the "Operation Dark Harvest" section and the elaboration on the 2023 wildfire. The wording used is also sufficiently non-biased and clinical in tone, and uses appropriately formal wording. As far as I could tell, there were no grammatical errors.

There is one instance of a claim being made that is without reference, seen here in the section on "Biological warfare testing":


 * Though no exact contamination levels were recorded, Porton Down scientists did confirm that the soil levels were contaminated through annual testing between 1948 and 1968. Porton Down personnel were the only ones allowed to visit the island due to these periodic check of toxicity. It was clear that the anthrax was not going to be going away easily.

Everything else seems to be well cited with primary and trustworthy references.