User:Rashaaasfour/Gruinard Island/CrazELearning Peer Review

General info
Rashaaasfour
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Rashaaasfour/Gruinard Island
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Gruinard Island

Evaluate the drafted changes
Howdy Rashaaasfour! My peer review is detailed below:

Biological Warfare
- The added content in bold is relevant to the topic and adds some depth into an experiment done by Louis Pasteur who used sheep infected with Anthrax. It works here because it adds some more information about the use of Anthrax and how it was developed in the biological warfare.

- How does Anthrax sustain itself in the soil? It would be helpful to have a couple sentences to elaborate on how it "was not going to be going away easily."

Operation Dark Harvest
- The added sections here were written well and stayed relevant to their respective section. The research checks out and flows well with the rest of the article that you are editing, as well as easily understood.

- Have you considered adding a few sentences about what happened to the Dark Harvest group after their use of Anthrax on the soil? I feel it would be helpful for the reader to know what happened to the group afterwards without confusion. This Scottish Extreme group is intriguing nevertheless and the newly drafted section helps to clarify the significance of their group.

Decontamination
- Have you thought about researching into their pre-planning for how they wanted to decontaminate the Gruinard Island? Perhaps it could add some insight into how they were researching into the lasting effects of the anthrax attack in a couple sentences before their main effort.

Wildfire
- The additions to this section helped to add more details about how the state of island is currently.

Tone and Balance
- The tone of the added sections are done very well. Meaning that it does not sound opinionated in any form as well as blends into the information that was already present. It does not sound like it is trying to persuade the reader in any way as if it was an argumentative essay.

Other Note(s)/Suggestion(s):
- I appreciate how you bolded your drafted contributions in your sandbox to be easily found.

- Your contributions add specific details that aren't part of the original article and provides some more information on certain sections.