User:Rashanmarcus/Child sexual abuse/Tltuggle18 Peer Review

"Child sexual abuse"

General info
(provide username) Rashanmarcus
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Creating User:Rashanmarcus/Child sexual abuse - Wikipedia :
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Child_sexual_abuse&oldid=1226593596

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Your article seems very established already so it's going to hard to edit it. I did notice that the sources are outdated. So, if you can find some newer ones and add new information on child sexual abuse I think that could improve this article you chose.

While I can see its importance, the incest section of this article is almost irrelevant with some relevant information I would take out " he most-often reported form of incest is father–daughter and stepfather–stepdaughter incest, with most of the remaining reports consisting of mother/stepmother–daughter/son incest. Father–son incest is reported less often; however, it is not known if the actual prevalence is less or it is under-reported by a greater margin. Similarly, some argue that sibling incest may be as common, or more common, than other types of incest: Goldman and Goldman reported that 57% of incest involved siblings; Finkelhor reported that over 90% of nuclear family incest involved siblings; while Cawson et al. show that sibling incest was reported twice as often as incest perpetrated by fathers/stepfathers." Because most of this information is outdated, I would take it out or find new sources for this.

You have a lot to do so I would start working asap!