User:Rauscha/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Article: Functional Groups

All of the information in the article is relevant. Some of the wording in the first three paragraphs could be improved, and more citations should be added because some of the information that should be cited is not.

Viewpoints in this article are neutral and balanced. The top sets of functional groups have more written about them than most of the bottom sets. The first descriptions go into discussions on orbitals and reaction types, which the latter descriptions don't do.

The links for the citations work, but there should be more of them, as not all of the information has a source listed. The sources that are listed are unbiased.

The talk page mostly features discussions about what information could be missing from the page and where it should go. It also has a few discussions about error corrections. The article is rated as Start-Class and is part of both the Chemistry and Molecular and Cell Biology WikiProjects. The discussion of the topic here is much more involved than in class, and people engage with one another more frequently and in more depth.

Article Selection
Article: Cortivazol

The article has almost no content and is marked as a stub of mid-importance. In editing this article we could discuss the structure of the drug, its uses, any observed adverse effects it may have on patients, its history, and other various information like price and dosage.

Article: Gilteritinib

This article has very little content. It has very basic information about what the drug has been passed for, but there is room to expand. More about the creation of the drug could be added, as well as the chemical structure of the drug and what it is used for. We could also discuss research about the drug and other various information like price and more specific information dosage information.