User:Ravedave/auto review

Minnesota
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question.
 * Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -  between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18&amp;nbsp;mm.
 * Done -Ravedave 17:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * As per WP:MOSDATE, dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.
 * Verified. -Ravedave 18:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Per WP:MOS, headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading  ==Magellan's journey== , use  ==Journey== .
 * Minnesota Territory violates this, but I think just 'Territory' is wrong... -Ravedave 17:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL.
 * Minnesota's refsection is slightly differernt (and I like it better) -Ravedave 17:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Please alphabetize the.
 * Done? YurikBot should already do this...-Ravedave 17:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) maybe too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per WP:SS.
 * article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
 * There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
 * Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
 * Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “ All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
 * Temporal terms like “over the years”, “currently”, “now”, and “from time to time” often are too vague to be useful, but occasionally may be helpful. “I am now using a semi-bot to generate your peer review.”
 * As is done in WP:FOOTNOTE, for footnotes, the footnote should be located right after the punctuation mark, such that there is no space inbetween. For example, change blah blah [2]. to blah blah.[2]
 * Done- Ravedave 17:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Ravedave 05:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.