User:RavensandStars/Cassandra/SpaceVarangian Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

RavensandStars


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:RavensandStars/Cassandra


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cassandra

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think your lead is great and adds to the opening of the article and gives a good introduction to your part. I think that the part you're adding is very important to the topic and Cassandra's role as a in Greek mythology.

I think your organization is good, could the play by Euripides go into the Mythology segment though? It might be worth its own section but depending on your interpretation might be part of Greek myth in the Fall of Troy and Aftermath part or maybe combined with the play by Aeschylus segment.

I think your part about the Euripides play is very well written and has a neutral tone and gives a lot of information about the play, but could you add more about Cassandra herself?

The article presents a lot of different views from a lot of different sources that gives readers a good idea about Cassandra. Of the sources themselves from the main article the Theoi source might need to be reexamined as that is not a peer reviewed source.

The images you are adding are great for the topic, especially since you are focusing on the Euripides play and the tragedy of Cassandra.

Was the line about Cassandra being thought of as clever from a source? If not it might be prudent to remove it as it could be seen to lack supporting evidence. I it might also be prudent to state the names of your sources within the article to further clarify where the information comes from. Is that opening part from a source?