User:Rayhart27/sandbox

Evaluating an article
Forensics in antiquity


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Yes, everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. No, there is nothing that distracted me.


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

The article is neutral. There are no claims that appear heavily biased.


 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented?

There are only four sections in the article. They are about the different methods used in ancient forensics. The articles could use more substance, perhaps a more in depth history of the methods.


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

There are no links. The only source is a book by Schafer, Elizabeth D.

Wikipedia Project - George Sarton
We are working on the George Sarton article and my partner is Logan Ingram.

Sarton began working with the school of Spanish Arabists in 1928, then lead by Julian Ribera y Tarrago and Miguel Asin Palacios. ~lbiygd

The Spanish Arabists contributed to Isis and Sarton had some of their articles published in it. ~lbiygd

Sarton shared more views in common with the Spanish Arabists than he did with other historians of science. The had similar views on what constitutes science. Sarton and the Spanish also shared similar views on diffusion. He lead a group of scholars who acted as patrons to the Spanish.

Review by K8shep (talk) 19:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
I can't really tell who did what here, so I'm reviewing it together. Make sure you're keeping track of the new Wikipedia instructions, see Canvas!

1. what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? I see that you're going to be adding smaller bits of information throughout the article and that's great! This is good stuff.

2. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? Make sure you're citing your source after every statement. You are on the right track here. I hope you have more to add. If you're having trouble with sources, let me know

3. What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Add more! Cite sources.