User:RaymondZqiu/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
AI for Good

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Because my subject is artificial intelligence, this is very related to my subject. I'm very curious about what AI practitioners around the world have done to promote the development of the AI ​​industry in general.

Evaluate the article
The lead is consice and clearly describes teh article's topic.

I think the article's content is relevant to the topic and up-to-date because it lists the lasted event. But the content is too simple becase it just list the time and the key speakers of annual events. There should be more details related to those events in the article.

I think the tone of the whole article is nertrual. Because this article mainly focuses on the AI for food and lists the key event related to this platform, I don't think there is any bias toward a particular position. In the article, because there is not a lot of text in the whole article, I can't tell that it is represented or underrepresented. As a result, I don't think the article persuades the readers in favor of one position or away from another.

I check all of the sourses of to verify they are accurate, trustworthy and up-to-date. I don't think this article may include individuals who have been marginalized in history. I cannot find too much peer-reviewed articles related to this topic.

Generally speaking, this article is clear and easy to read without making grammatical mistakes. Pictures in this article is totally related the topic and adhere the Wikipedia's copyright regulations. But visually they are laid out too tight. I think the article can have richer content.