User:Razanonymous/Culture of Libya/Zainwikieditor2345 Peer Review

General info
Razanonymus
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Razanonymous/Culture_of_Libya?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Culture of Libya

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content:

- the content is very relevant and gives a good insight of the culture of libya and provides detailed information about the topic.

- it is up to date, modern libya however also gives an insight of the history of libya in regards to music and art, giving people more information of what it was and how it is modern day.

- it does address topics related to an underrepresented group and gives the topic more justice.

Tone:

- the tone is balanced and not biased, simply states facts.

- all the information added is solely based on facts and not on opinions nor biases.

Sources:

- the second source is a newspaper article, that isnt on the independent media: TRT World's argument that it is independent was rejected by US officials who found and claim that the Turkish government "exercises direction and control of TRT by regulation and oversight, and by controlling its leadership, budget, and content." Should be reconsidered and maybe find a journal about the cave art.

- the third source is an organization specialized in libyan art, therefore is credible.

- the sources are overall decent, however I recommend to search for more reliable articles such as peer reviewed journals about the libyan culture, to get a more resourceful and factual facts.

Organization:

- it is easy to read

- it has some grammatical errors, such as leave a space between the full stop and the next sentence and create some more coherent flow between the sentences rather than ending it abrumptly and starting the next one.

Overall I believe the additions my peer made to this article are intuitive and add significant value to the article, however newer and more credible sources are recommended and fixing the structure of the additions in general.