User:Rcm183/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Apparently, I chosen to evaluate the article for LinkedIn.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
The reason I have chosen this article in particular, is because I was assigned this article by my professor. This evaluation will assess my ability to carry out effective and thorough evaluations and will provide me with experience for providing future evaluations.

Evaluate the article
The article for LinkedIn is a decent length and contains many important details pertaining to the history and current status of the service. The contents presented in the article are fairly relevant, ranging from describing details regarding the platform's creation, maintenance, legal issues, typical usages, features, and many more aspects that help in accurately describing what it's overall purpose and direction has been. Based on the several sources provided within the citations/footnotes, I would also say that this article is up to date, with some sources being from publications as late as 2021; most crucial information about the platform also seems to be present. The article seems to appropriately take a neutral stance in presenting the information provided; there are no claims that appear to exhibit and type of bias. Relevant visuals are present where appropriate, and most of the links I checked were generally still online with the exception of a direct link to a specific page on LinkedIn itself, ironically; the link for ''"Filtering and Tagging Connections Feature – No Longer Available". LinkedIn Help Pages. February 2, 2017'' seems to no longer be functional (https://www.linkedin.com/help/linkedin/answer/72331?lang=en). Additionally, this page is absent from The Internet Archive as well, it may potentially need to be corrected or removed. Aside from this defunct link, the information source generally seem to be reliable and from a fairly large variety of different authors and publications.