User:Rdahl kn/Indian Rights for Indian Women/Lollins Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Rdalh kn, ryancollins1999, adev04!
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Indian Rights for Indian Women

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? the "Carlson, N., Steinhauer, K., Goyette, L., & Campbell, M. (2013). Disinherited Generations: Our Struggle to Reclaim Treaty Rights for First Nations Women and their Descendants. Edmonton, AB: The University of Alberta Press. 55-56." that's cited is properly formatted, but there's no link provided so it's not easily accessible. Perhaps this is cause of copyright or access limitations a large majority of the citations in the article are from this article so if it's possible to provide the link or DOI that would probably be good.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? N/A
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes it does.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? The article has 13 citations, it seems to be quite exhaustive due to the limited nature of available resources.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? This is well done in the History section but could be improved upon in the Challenges, Achievements, and Outcomes sections.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Considering this article is entirely new it's come very far, and the group working on this has done a great job finding relevant resources and throughly explaining the movement.
 * How can the content added be improved? If possible I think visuals could greatly enhance the article, as well, I think the Background subsection in History could be moved to either it's own section, or before History of Legislation on Indian Women's Status in order to help the flow of the article.

==== Overall evaluation: '''Overall it was very well done and the reviews are minor. Photographs would be a great addition to the article, but I understand there are often difficulties with copyright and such. Finally adding more links to other articles so as to make this article more discoverable would be a great idea so other can learn of this grassroots organization and see the wonderful additions made to this Wiki article!''' ====