User:Rdatwan1/Self-expansion model/Ajohn319 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

rdatwan1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rdatwan1/Self-expansion_model?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Self-expansion model
 * Self-expansion model

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is updated and incorporates the information needed. Is an overview of the topic and is concise. The major topics are addressed in the lead. The idea of the connection between self-expansion model and relationships is done well.

Content added is relevant and seems up-to-date. Everything added seems necessary and adds value to the article.

Tone is neutral and the topic is balanced. Is a presentation of facts and findings, is not argumentative or biased.

Sources seem credible and what is written does not misrepresent the literature or web pages. Much of the literature used is recent and thus up to date. There is also a variety of people cited, there is not too much reliance on one source.

Well-organized and easy to both read and understand.

No images or media, but I can't think of anything to add that would be necessary or helpful for this article.

I found your article interesting and the contribution you made valuable!