User:Rdelunal/Betsy Thunder/27manpreet Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Rdelunal


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rdelunal/Betsy_Thunder?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Betsy Thunder
 * Betsy Thunder

Peer Review
The article is really great so far! The lead is concise and provides a great explanation on Betsy Thunder. The content mentioned so far seems really interesting and related to the topic. However, I would recommend adding more information about Betsy Thunder if possible. I'm not sure if this would help but I think the book Women's Wisconsin: From Native Matriarchies to the New Millennium might be a helpful source for your article and its available at the Langson Library. I came across another book called The uncommon lives of common people by Brown that had some information about Betsy Thunder which could also be helpful. Unfortunately the book isn't available at the library so to access it you might have to reach out to Melissa, she's amazing and really helpful!.

The tone of the article seems very neutral and informative, and I don't think its biased or leaning towards a particular viewpoint. It's also very well organized. The sources are great and are very reliable. All of them so far seem to be academic articles. In the introduction the article connects to other Wikipedia articles which I thought was pretty great! So far there isn't any media posted, but I think the original article had a picture of Betsy Thunder. I recommend adding more sources for the Ho-Chunk Nation and Medicine Man/Woman section. The links for the sources work perfectly, but I wasn't able to figure out the diversity of the authors of the sources.

Overall I think it's a pretty great article so far! I do recommend adding more information about Betsy Thunder if possible, but the background information on the Ho-Chuck Nation and Medicine men/women works perfectly.