User:Re332168/Ligase/Dasiomo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/users/Re332168

User: Re332168


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Re332168/Ligase?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ligase

Evaluate the drafted changes
The edited version of the article is more concise, precise, and easier to read.

However, some of the information that was removed could have been helpful for readers to better understand the concept. For instance, the original version provided detailed information about the six subclasses of ligases, which could have been useful for readers interested in learning about the various types of ligases. Furthermore, this information was relevant to the example, mentioned in "Ligase" section, of an enzyme linking two compounds and forming new bonds.

Unfortunately, not much was added or edited in the article. Instead, the removal of some information reduced the article's detail.

Additionally, the reference section was removed, and external website URLs were placed in the middle of the article without proper citation. It would have been better to keep the reference section and have a separate section for external websites. It is also important to verify and update the retrieval date of the sole reference that supports the data to ensure the information is current.

Furthermore, there are gaps between some sentences in the same paragraph, which should be addressed. In the "Nomenclature" section, the first sentence in bold font and parenthesis is confusing as the added information is not cohesive with the rest of the sentence. The external website added to the article relates to the same topic and could have been included in the same paragraph.

There are no image added.

This article appears to be a challenging one to edit as it appears to be mostly complete. Although the writer added some useful information and shortened the article, it would be beneficial to enhance the article's depth and accuracy by including more details and images instead of removing useful information. Therefore, I suggest adding a separate section for references and external sources to properly cite external websites and make it easier for readers to find the information they need.

~Dasiomo