User:Reaelise13/Haemophilus influenzae/Asherkhan5284 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Reaelise13, Raf19275, Secretly a power 2


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Reaelise13/Haemophilus_influenzae?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Haemophilus influenzae

Evaluate the drafted changes
In the article, I really liked how detailed the background information is on Haemophilus influenzae. It gives the reader a clear overview of what the bacteria actually is and what it does. I also liked the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention areas because that is what most people probably want to know in order to avoid it. I think the article is balanced in terms of tone. It doesn't lean to one side or the other, it simply stated the facts with citations. The article seems up to date as far as treatment and diagnosis go. The new content is backed up by the references and provides background information on Haemophilus influenzae. I feel like the information in the sandbox draft is redundant to the information that is already present in the article. More information could be added on the variants of Haemophilus influenzae like the a, b, c, d, e, and f. The article only expands on type B, but I am curious about the rest of the variants and why they are not mentioned? References are used correctly and to corresponding information. I don't really understand the point of the Latex Particle Agglutination. I think that should be explained thoroughly and its purpose. Overall, majority of the article looks good, but the draft should not be repeating the information that is already said in the article. There should be new information and expanding on the previous mentioned ideas.