User:Reaelise13/Haemophilus influenzae/Nikith Naini Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Reaelise13)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Haemophilus influenzae
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Haemophilus influenzae

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead does not include all things listed in the rest of the article but it is a good start. Much of the info is listed in the beginning concisely and without too much detail, allowing for further explanation.

The content in the article is all pertaining to the subject and therefore valid. It all is on topic, there might be a little more information to be dug up from the listed references.

Information seems to be recent because of most sources are from the past 20 years. Of course there are some older articles used, but the information provided is accurate and presented properly.

There is no bias in the presentation of information.

Sources are from reliable sources. The links provided work for most of the sources, however there are some sources that do not have links that are easily followed. The sources were selected properly and serve a purpose in the article.

The way the article is written seems to be a little too informal at times. The way things are worded, especially at the beginning could use some fine tuning. That is not to say the things said are incorrect, but the grammar and presentation could be made much better.

The images could be laid out in a more aesthetic way. I think the images require citations and are therefore not cited properly and don't fit copyright rules.

Overall the article could use some work in presentation and perhaps adding some extra information. The information itself has a lot of potential and sources are from reliable sources. I think this paper is really on the right track to being great!!