User:Reaggyl/Dendroctonus valens/Sachi.sb Peer Review

General info
Reaggyl
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Dendroctonus valens
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Dendroctonus valens

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, I thought this article was well written; all the complex jargon was broken down into very easily digestible information. When communicating this information however, I would look into where certain topics are being mentioned and staying consistent with that so there is no redundancy throughout your article. Additionally, I would proofread before publishing just to check for typos/grammatical errors because they could appear anywhere and it does affect readability. I also think the phrasing of certain sentences could be reworked to make them less run-on. Otherwise, I think the way your information was organized was very logical and relevant.