User:Realityandexistence00/Floating man/AlmaAb11 Peer Review

Strengths: The content adds depth to the original article, provides insight into the origins of the theory and how it came to be (in the Background: the information is much more detailed now, less vague). The addition is written in a concise fashion, implementing clarity onto the theory.

Weaknesses: The structure can be improved, the content can stand to be slightly more organized.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)