User:Rebarob22/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Visual communication

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is a topic which I have studied in depth previously and have a deep understanding of. From an initial look, the article seems to clear address the most important aspects of the visual communication topic.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Overall, the article offers detailed, relevant, and up-to-date information on the topic of visual communication. It does lack in it's emphasis and coverage of the components section. Because the components create the foundation for visual communication, it would be beneficial to move them towards the beginning of the article as well as providing more detail explanations and examples of each components.

Some aspects of the introduction are discussed very little or not at all in the later contents of the article.

The article offers a neutral and effective perspective of the topic.

The article sources all appear to be up to date and contain working links. As well, there is an array of authors and sources. However, upon further review, some of the sources seem to have bias or are directly related to the subject of visual communication.

In terms of the talk page, a lot of the discussions are citing the need for more sources as well as sources which are more reliable. Other discussions include adding more visual aides to help drive readers to engage more on the page, as well as the need to go further in-depth of parts of topic which are very bare and under discussed in comparison to other aspects of the article.