User:Rebekah Greenwood/Passerini reaction/KZhengUBC Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

@Rebekah Greenwood, @Sganz3, @Sheryl Munshan


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rebekah%20Greenwood/Passerini_reaction?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Passerini reaction

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead


 * The updated lead is much more well developed than the existing. Perhaps the original reaction scheme could be included as a quick visual summary of the reaction.
 * The reaction's use in green chemistry is mentioned but does not seem to be developed in the body

Content

 * Content is relevant and up to date

Tone and Balance

 * Content is neutral without showing author opinion or an attempt at persuasion
 * Claims are well supported and free of bias

Sources and References

 * Article is well supported with plenty of sources, some recent
 * Sources are written by a wide group of authors and from a varied group of journals

Organisation

 * Article is well written and easy to read
 * Contents are organised into well-defined sections and subsections
 * The sections make sense and encompass the major points of the topic

Images and Media

 * Images are used effectively and properly captioned
 * The reaction mechanisms are very well done
 * The images under "Applications" make it easy to see the types of products that can be synthesized using this reaction