User:Rebekah Greenwood/Passerini reaction/Kat3r1nayr Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Rebekah Greenwood, Sganz3, Sheryl Munshan


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Rebekah Greenwood/Passerini Reaction
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * passerini reaction
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * passerini reaction
 * passerini reaction

Evaluate the drafted changes
- good improvement of the lead

- The lead is more clear and I like how you added more recent utility of the reaction

-"Recently, Denmark et al. have developed an enantioselective catalyst for asymmetric Passerini reactions.", why was this section removed? If expanded it could add more information to the article.

- Images of mechanism are slightly blurry.

- I would label each step of the mechanism with a number and then describe the mechanism step by step below the image. This would make the mechanism easier to read and understand.

- Expand reaction control section:

- specifically polymer properties. How would stoichiometric means control molecular weights of polymers?

-What is a vortex fluidic device? Is it possible to include a link to a wikipedia page that explains this? if not, maybe add a sentence or two about what it is.

- Expand amino acids application section. All other application sections are longer and include more detail. It may be beneficial to include some examples like you have in the pharmaceuticals section.

- the section in the original article under scope which talks about multicomponent reactions including the Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons reaction can be expanded and included in the applications section.

Overall good improvements to the article!